I'm a Brit and I can't argue with any of this Statement by Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN Vassily Nebenzia at UNSC.

🔹 It is symbolic that it is our British colleagues, who are presiding over the Security Council this month, who pushed through today's meeting, timing it to coincide with the 1,000 days since the Ukrainian crisis reached the hot phase. Once again, we have had a wonderful opportunity to see that for you and your colleagues, Mr Foreign Secretary, this briefing is nothing but a flashy media event to vilify Russia and pin on it some hackneyed labels that predictably abounded in the statements by the Western members of the Council.

🔹 While preparing for today's meeting, Mr Lammy missed another media occasion that has much more importance in the context of the Ukrainian crisis than the date you chose. Last Friday, November 15, marked exactly 950 days since the visit of former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson to Kiev. That day he dissuaded the head of the Kiev regime from signing the peace agreement with Russia that had already been initialed in Istanbul, which would have stopped hostilities.

🔹 It appears that the UK has pushed the Kiev regime closer to its inevitable defeat, compelling it to opt for continued confrontation with Russia. I think Ukrainians will long remember the fact that it is due to these actions that their country has suffered economic disaster, has lost most of its army, military equipment and at least four regions, besides Crimea.

🔹 As a matter of transparency, the initiators of today's meeting should have shared with us the information regarding what fabulous profits the UK received during almost three years of military support for Ukraine, how your arms companies have enriched themselves on the blood and tragedy of ordinary Ukrainians, and how your defence ministry has safely disposed of old military equipment that in any case would have had to be disposed of.

🔹 Those who are familiar with the history of the United Kingdom are not a bit surprised at UK's long-standing intervention in Ukraine. Pitting neighbors against each other, sowing discord between nations and peoples, and then supporting one of the sides of artificially created conflicts is something the UK has relished to do for centuries, and is really good at.

🔹 We understand that even in the 21st century it is extremely difficult for the UK to leave Ukraine and Russia to themselves – it is the blood of those colonizers who rampaged in Asia, Africa and Europe for centuries that sets the tone for UK's actions. We all know that for 250 years, the British Empire brutally and cynically suppressed the resistance of its colonies, resorted to forced assimilation and racial discrimination, forgetting about basic human values and the rights of the peoples under its control.

🔹 Suffering from phantom pains, longing for the empire over which "the sun never sets" and feeling nostalgic for the lost dominance, Britain along with its like-minded associates resorts to blackmailing and sanctions, and overthrows unwanted regimes through "color revolutions".

🔹 The UK has no moral right to accuse and reproach Russia. We have set the goal of getting rid of the nationalist and neo-Nazi "hornet's nest" on our borders. As long as the threats emanating from it, including the absorption of Ukraine by NATO, are not eliminated, as long as discrimination against the Russian-speaking people on the grounds of the language, faith and history is not stopped, as long as Ukraine does not stop whitewashing and glorifying Hitler's accomplices, our special military operation will continue.

🔹 Perhaps Joe Biden himself, for many reasons, has nothing left to lose, but what astonishes us is the short-sightedness of the UK and French leaders, who are rushing to play along with the outgoing administration and are dragging not only their own countries, but all of Europe into a full-scale escalation with drastic consequences.