I have absolute sympathy for the family of the children murdered in Minnesota, as well as the injured and total contempt for the perpetrator but I am also troubled that after the outcry and debate over the 2nd amendment there will be no real investigation into the fact that it is yet another young trans shooter. Why is there such a force to shut down such obvious connections? Is it to protect big pharma, as much has been done for decades?
What I am more troubled by is that there is no such outcry for the children murdered on a daily basis. Is it because they are children of the wrong God or born into the wrong land?
I don’t always look to the devil at play, but I do today as there is a convergence of three things. To begin with I consider the significance of three, which is meaningful in Orthodoxy, symbolising the Holy Trinity, in other religions it stands for peace, freedom and brotherhood. The three things of demonic evidence is what I mentioned in the slaughter of children, the second is the speech by Smotrich and third being the arrival of Blair to the White House to discuss Gaza.
As for Smotrich, at least he is not trying to disguise intent to kill or expel by any means and without exception, to be the other is enough regardless of age or faith to be Palestinian is to be his Amalek. He is a monster that much is obvious, but what he says about Trump is not wishful thinking or misrepresentation, for what he says we have heard Trump himself utter. Trump though dressed up criminality as humanitarian intervention leaving me in little doubt that he would declare himself saviour of the Palestinian people once he has helped ship them out from expulsion zones in Gaza to camps in Sudan. At least that is the current nominated place of refuge. Little consideration that most being pushed for transportation are already refugees whose family homes and land were stolen by those who turned the right of return into the right to take.
The third I mention is Blair at the White House, his previous role as Middle East special peace envoy always sickened me given the war crimes he is responsible for against Iraq, so what can he do for Gaza other than hasten the destruction? He has financially benefited, albeit via his ‘foundation’, from the ‘junk bond king’ Michael Milken who funded illegal settlements in the West Bank, but Blair’s institute has also been linked to plans that would ethnically cleanse Gaza.
When we see the headlines and grief expressed over the murder of children in America whilst the children of Palestine have been dehumanised then we observe how zealots like Smotrich are doing the dirty work for those who crave the financial rewards of ‘cleansing Gaza’ while claiming clean hands, “out damn spot” I think not.
The riches they envisage are that of El Dorado. A coast of Golden resorts perhaps named Trumpistan are being imagined if not already planned. Trump himself made a comparison that Gaza could be rebuild along the lines of Dubai. What though Dubai can never offer as a guaranteed money spinner is sex and gambling. Nothing to prevent that in glittering Trumpistan. Of course that the Adelsons have such expertise in making money off Las Vegas, it would be mere coincidence, as would any influence in the Oval Office have nothing to do with future revenues from an interest in a second city of sin regardless of whose blood and bones it’s built on.
Then we should consider the trillions to be made from the fossil fuel reserves of the Levant. Who benefits from them if not those who have paid Blair so well for his advice? Likewise, we cannot simply ignore that Cyprus is being occupied and zealot voices are promoting further division with Turkey, is that ignorance or design and connected to the Levant field?
We will no doubt be fed a narrative that all is being done to save the Palestinians and the likes of Blair will display deep concern in front of the MSM cameras and offer platitudes of working for a lasting peace. But is it for peace or profit? I ask if it is not the genocide, the ethnic cleansing, the injustice that upsets them more that it has become such a PR problem they bring in Blair to orchestrate a new narrative? If it really was about a peace then they would have long since called for a halt on all trade to Israel, not a future threat, not words but actions. Look at what they do, not what they say we are frequently told, I would add to that look at the money, the trail backwards and the one that paves the way forward.
As I said in my opening I don’t always consider the devil at play, but I’ve seen this falsehood before by same performers who presented evil as good.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/tony-blair-institute-linked-gaza-plan-condemned-ethnic-cleansing