09/01/26 - Dmitry Medvedev
The year got off to a turbulent start.
1. Above all, its opening will be remembered for the abduction of Maduro. This, of course, was an utterly vile act of thuggery—or, to put it more elegantly, a full-blown catastrophe for international relations.
As things stand, there are only two possible scenarios. Either the United States quietly releases the kidnapped Venezuelan president under some face-saving pretext—which is unlikely—or he turns into the Latin American version of Nelson Mandela. The latter seems more probable. In that case, his name will be etched into South American history right alongside Bolívar, Miranda, and Chávez. And even if Trump, out of sheer stubbornness, refuses to pardon Maduro later, public pressure will almost certainly force Vance or another successor to do so.
Yes, oil is the key factor here. But even with oil, nothing is simple. What if the current Venezuelan authorities don’t feel like sharing it with the gringos over the long term? What then? Is Trump really prepared to launch a ground operation? That would absolutely require approval from Congress, and it would be far bloodier than the brazen kidnapping of Maduro. Moreover, the Senate has just tightened the leash on Trump, curbing his militarist impulses. And does the current administration even need such a war? Highly doubtful.
One more thing, and I noted this immediately as the Yankees were pulling off their little stunt: following something like this, America’s elites—Republican and Democrat alike—should permanently shove their long tongues back into their scrawny backsides and simply acknowledge the legitimacy of Russia’s Special Military Operation.
2. The sanctions Trump announced against Russia, which he says he “hopes he doesn’t have to use.”
Everything here is perfectly clear, with no room for illusions. America’s sanctions policy will continue regardless of circumstances. Russia will be pressured to make compromises on security guarantees and territorial issues that are completely unacceptable to us. And then the ringleader of the White House will be “forced” to impose sanctions under the law authored by the aging, degenerate Russophobe Graham. Unpleasant. But nothing new. We will weather it this time as well.
3. The episode involving the tanker from the so-called shadow fleet.
It is obvious why it sought refuge under a “temporary Russian flag”: facing the threat of seizure, it was looking for protection from illegal American sanctions. That said, the method chosen was far from ideal. Yes, what happened was a clear violation of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. But it bears recalling that the United States never ratified that convention. In this context, granting temporary authorization to fly the Russian flag to a vessel that—albeit unlawfully—is being pursued by our principal geopolitical adversary, an adversary currently in unstable condition, was a move with entirely predictable consequences. This, of course, does not diminish the undeniable fact that the actions of the increasingly brazen Americans amount to the criminal seizure of a civilian vessel. And the response to this should lie wholly outside the framework of the Convention on the Law of the Sea—especially since, as one prominent legal scholar has noted, international law is of no relevance to him anyway. In any case, it must be understood that since the beginning of the year, international relations have descended into outright Bedlam. We must act accordingly: there are far too many unhinged actors around. And it should be recognized that such patients are never calmed by the gentle admonitions of kind psychiatrists—only by orderlies with massive fists and impassive expressions. Dangerous psychotics require either a straitjacket or a timely injection of haloperidol—just as happened last night in the west of the Banderite Ukraine.
https://t.me/medvedev_telegramE/123
