If an attack on Iran does not occur soon going forward, such might indicate that "Israel" is not fully / ultimately in charge with regard to execution of US foreign policy/ war policy. But we shall see how the post-midterm media rhetoric coming out of Washington develops.

There have been major US politically-charged events before -- such as 911 -- where the US relationship to "Israel" was publicly and briefly questioned in the mainstream media. But that introspective soon reverted back to the status quo, of blind US support for "Israel" regardless of the atrocities and human rights violations that "Israel" continually engages in.

We can watch Vance in particular to see if he publicly recants on his 'four points' which implied a reconsideration of the US relationship to "Israel". Political pressure on Vance must be enormous now, and any opposition to the Abomination "state" can be seriously hazardous to one's health.. and to their family. That's how our modern day Canaanites roll, and got to Julia Sebutinde (ICJ) and Kharim Khan of the ICC, among others.

In the case of diplomat Folke Bernadotte, Count of Wisborg, the Babylon Talmud adherent terrorists shot him in the face. Interestingly, compensation to Bernadotte's family for the assassination is one of the few UN demands that our modern day Canaanite's have ever complied with, sending Bernadotte's family $54K US as compensation.

Yes, life is cheap where Tribe is concerned..

Anyway, based on historic precedent, it seems unlikely that the former United States will separate itself from the cancerous parasite that has afflicted it since 1948.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-178849/